Proxy voting report to June 2014
1. Proxy Voting in Australia
In the six month period to 30 June 2014:
- CSC's votes were exercised on 420 resolutions at 85 meetings of 84 companies.
- CSC abstained on 1 resolution on the advice of CSC's investment managers.
- The majority of contentious resolutions continue to relate to the election of directors and incentive issues, including remuneration.
- CSC supported 92% of resolutions put to shareholders by company management.
|Key Statistics||Jan to Jun
|Jul to Dec
|Jan to Jun
|Number of company meetings where votes were submitted||73||266||84|
|Number of resolutions voted on||364||1372||420|
|% of meetings where remuneration reports were considered||66%||89%||59%|
|% of remuneration reports that were not supported by CSC||6.2%||12%||8%|
|Total resolutions for a board spill
(in the event of a "second strike") considered
|Resolutions for a board spill supported by CSC||0||1||0|
|% of resolutions where director elections were supported||97%||93%||99%|
CSC supports compensation arrangements for management and directors that are reasonable and fit for the purpose of attracting and rewarding talent for efforts and achievement within their control. In assessing non-binding resolutions to adopt remuneration reports CSC expects to see clear and concise remuneration reports that disclose all relevant information, facilitate understanding of the company's remuneration policy and are aligned with shareholder interests.
- During the period CSC's votes were exercised on 50 resolutions seeking support for remuneration reports. CSC voted against 4 of those reports for failure to meet the expectations outlined above.
- CSC also voted against specific grants to directors due to insufficiently-explained performance hurdles, large payments not demonstrably aligned with performance and share grants to non-executive directors.
Where a company receives more than 25% of votes against its remuneration report in two consecutive years, the Corporations Act gives shareholders the right to vote on whether an entire board should stand for re-election. Recent reforms also prohibit key management personnel from voting on the remuneration report and on any two-strikes board spill, as well as from hedging incentive remuneration. These changes have removed the ability for executives to vote and approve their own pay.
- CSC voted on 3 spill resolutions during the period, finding support for company recommendations against the resolutions in all instances.
- Investors were asked to approve an increase in the maximum aggregate level of fees that could be paid to companies' non-executive directors at 3 meetings during the period. CSC supported all 3 proposals.
3. Director Election
CSC considered 138 proposals for director elections, rejecting only 1 proposed appointment.
4. Constitutional matters
CSC supported proposals for all 30 constitutional amendments sought by companies.
5. Proxy Voting at meetings of international companies
Upon the introduction of a new agreement with CGI Glass Lewis (CGL) in 2013 CGL has provided a research and voting service for all unimpeded International Equities holdings in accordance with CGL voting policies in each country on CSC's behalf. CSC does not vote in markets that require share blocking, account re-registration or any other additional steps or impediments to voting.
- From July 2013 CGI Glass Lewis has researched and voted upon CSC's International Equities holdings in accordance with CGL's voting policies. Since January 2014 CGL has voted at 2358 meetings on 27,791resolutions in 50 Countries over 7 regions (excluding Australia).
|Issue Categories||No of resolutions||Resolutions not supported|
|Issue of new shares||89||9||
|Financial scheme/ reconstruciton of capital||35||10||29%|
|Constitution/ articles of association change||901||231||26%|
|Appoint/ Reappoint Auditor||1388||157||11%|
|Takeover or merger acquisition||88||7||8%|
|SHP - Environment||81||79||98%|
|SHP - Social||112||81||72%|
|All Other Proposals||9867||1950||20%|
Ballots by Region and Vote Status