Home / About us / Governance
2010 ESG update for members
The United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (UNPRI) reflect the view that environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) issues can affect the performance of investment portfolios. Because our aim is to always act in the best interest of our members, and because we believe that applying these Principles can help align investors with the broader objectives of society, we became a signatory of the UNPRI in 2006. Since that time we have adopted these Principles in our investment practices and this report provides an update on our ESG activities in 2010.
The UN Principles for Responsible Investment are:
- PRI1
- We will incorporate ESG issues into investment analysis and decision-making processes.
- PRI2
- We will be active owners and incorporate ESG issues into our ownership policies and practices.
- PRI3
- We will seek appropriate disclosure on ESG issues by the entities in which we invest.
- PRI4
- We will promote acceptance and implementation of the Principles within the investment industry.
- PRI5
- We will work together to enhance our effectiveness in implementing the Principles.
- PRI6
- We will each report on our activities and progress towards implementing the Principles.
UNPRI activity
The UNPRI conducts a comprehensive annual assessment rating the performance of each of the UNPRI signatories against each other based on their adherence to the Principles and their investment governance, policy and strategic (GPS) frameworks.
As indicated in the chart below, in 2010 our rankings have improved and we now rate in either the first or second quartile in 6 out of the 7 categories of superannuation funds globally.
Figure 1: ARIA's UNPRI ranking by quartile vs all asset owners
| 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | n/a | Quartile 2 | Quartile 2 | Quartile 1 |
| Governance, Policy and Strategy | n/a | n/a | Quartile 2 | Quartile 2 |
| Principle 1 | Quartile 3 | Quartile 3 | Quartile 4 | Quartile 3 |
| Principle 2 | Quartile 2 | Quartile 2 | Quartile 1 | Quartile 1 |
| Principle 3 | Quartile 4 | Quartile 3 | Quartile 3 | Quartile 2 |
| Principle 4 | Quartile 3 | Quartile 1 | Quartile 2 | Quartile 1 |
| Principle 5 | Quartile 1 | Quartile 2 | Quartile 1 | Quartile 1 |
| Principle 6 | Quartile 2 | Quartile 2 | Quartile 2 | Quartile 2 |
Quartile 1 = Top Quartile Quartile 4 = Bottom Quartile
Note: Scores have been calculated based on signatories’ self assessment and using the scoring methodology approved by the PRI Assessment Group. Although a limited verification exercise was undertaken with a proportion of signatories, responses have not been independently audited by the PRI Secretariat, PRI Assessment Group, or any other third party. Individual results including comparisons to the overall results (quartiles) are indicative and do not imply an endorsement of signatory activity. While this information is believed to be reliable, no representations or warranties are made as to the accuracy of information presented, and no responsibility or liability can be accepted for any error, omission or inaccuracy in this information.
The following is a list of activities we have engaged in during 2010 as part of our commitment to integrating the Principles into our investment practices.
| UNPRI | Actions |
|---|---|
PRI1 |
Ongoing
|
PRI2 |
Ongoing
|
PRI3 |
Ongoing
|
PRI4 |
Ongoing
|
PRI5 |
Ongoing
|
PRI6 |
Ongoing
|
Collaborative relationships
ARIA has developed collaborative relationships with other domestic and international investor groups in order to:
- engage with investee companies to increase advocacy and participation in the public policy debate
- initiate and advance the ESG research agenda
- promote increased corporate governance standards worldwide
- address the risks and opportunities associated with climate change and monitor the public policy response to it.
These engagements are taken into account in the UNPRI assessments and influenced our high ranking in 2010.
The table below details these collaborative relationships and outlines the purpose for our engagement.
| Industry collaboration | Aim |
|---|---|
United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (UNPRIs) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESG Research Australia (ESGRA) |
|
Regnan and RiskMetrics/Innovest benchmarking
We analyse the ESG risk exposure of our investments to enable us to develop and maintain an appropriate risk management process that is in line with our long-term investment goals. What is unique about our approach is that our analysis is across our entire portfolio, giving us a broad-spectrum perspective.
We use two data sources to analyse ESG risk on our portfolio. Regnan covers the top 200 Australian listed equities with three sub-scores to measure the environmental, social and corporate governance exposure of our invested companies. We also compute a blended average of those three scores giving an aggregate score. Additionally, we use RiskMetrics/Innovest scores to measure four facets of our international equity portfolio and RiskMetrics/Innovest also computes an aggregate ESG score.
The charts below show the ESG exposure of our equity portfolios. The first chart shows the ESG exposure of our Australian equity portfolio using Regnan data. Additionally we show the same analysis for the S&P/ASX 300 benchmark on this first chart.
The second chart shows the ESG exposure of our international equity portfolio using RiskMetrics/Innovest data and compares the ARIA portfolio to a common broad-equity benchmark for the asset class.
In both instances our investments are predominantly lower (meaning they bear less risk) than the benchmarks.

Note: As Regnan data covers the S&P/ASX 200, but our portfolio is a) actively managed and b) is benchmarked to the broader S&P/ASX 300, some of our investments have not been scored by Regnan. These are indicated in the ‘unrated’ columns.

Climate change
We have also given explicit consideration to the impact of climate change on ARIA’s portfolio and concluded that climate change, and energy, food and water security present an element of very long-term risk (50-100 years) to asset values, although most estimates of the direct impact on ARIA’s portfolio are small.
ARIA believes that over our investment horizon, an increasingly fragmented policy response is likely to alter prospective returns-for-risk across assets, industries, regions and corporations. The impact on volatility will be critical because policy responses to climate change will bring costs and opportunities forward and increase investment uncertainty. Increased uncertainty can have a much larger impact on investment valuations than simply the direct return implications.
Enhancing the sustainability of our properties
Our investment managers for our seven directly-owned properties have incorporated sustainability principles and initiatives into their investment processes and day-to-day property management. Sustainability initiatives have materially reduced the energy and water consumption of these properties.
Examples include:
- Installing sub-metering within buildings in order to accurately measure energy and water usage across base building services and individual tenants.
- Obtaining National Australian Built Environment Rating System (NABERS) energy and water ratings for each of our office investment properties. NABERS measures a building’s operational impact on the environment. The ratings provide a simple indication of how well these impacts are being managed.
- Appointing a specialist environmental sustainability consultant to assess each building and identify measures that can reduce energy and water usage and increase NABERS Energy and Water ratings. The consultant report forms the framework for improving the environmental sustainability performance and rating of each building.
- Actively exploring government funding initiatives/grants to reduce the cost of sustainability initiatives. In September 2009, 101 Collins St received the maximum grant available ($0.5m) from the Australian Government Green Building Fund to help fund sustainability initiatives.
17 January 2011
